Stay informed — get updates when we publish.
Stay informed. Get updates when we publish.
American elections are no longer primarily decided by voters. They are shaped by a small number of extremely wealthy donors who fund the candidates, buy the advertising, and operate in the shadows through anonymous nonprofits — all legally, thanks to a single Supreme Court decision in 2010. This series documents exactly how it works, who is paying for it, and why the political system it produced cannot fix itself.
$4.5B
outside spending in 2024
up from $574M in 2008
$1.9B
anonymous dark money in 2024
donors legally invisible
97%
of super PAC money from the top 1%
up from 77% in 2012
80%
of Americans oppose Citizens United
including 76% of Republicans
Source: OpenSecrets — the authoritative tracker of money in U.S. politics.
2004–2024 — Citizens United decided January 21, 2010
$574M → $4.5B — outside spending nearly quintupled between the last pre-Citizens United election and 2024.
Source: OpenSecrets Outside Spending by Election Cycle
Independent expenditures reported to FEC
Top donor is its own dark money arm — $136M source unknown
Aligned with McConnell leadership; coordinated with dark money arm
Primary super PAC backing Trump's 2024 campaign
Aligned with House Democratic leadership
Official super PAC of House Republican leadership
Backed by major Democratic donors
Your vote still counts. Elections are not fake. But the context in which elections happen has changed in measurable, documented ways since one Supreme Court decision in 2010. Outside spending in presidential elections has increased nearly eightfold. A handful of billionaires now account for nearly a fifth of all political spending. A significant portion of that money comes from donors who are legally permitted to remain anonymous.
This is not a conspiracy. It is a system — one built deliberately, defended carefully, and structured in ways that make it very difficult to change. This series explains how it works, who benefits from it, and what it would actually take to fix it.
Read in order. Each article builds on the last.
In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled 5–4 that corporations could spend unlimited money on elections. Outside spending has since nearly quintupled. This is how it happened, why it matters, and why 80% of Americans — including 76% of Republicans — want it reversed.
8 min readSuper PACs are legally required to operate independently of the campaigns they support. In practice, former campaign staffers run them, campaigns broadcast strategy on YouTube, and the FEC has issued exactly $26,000 in fines for coordination in fourteen years.
5 min readIn 2022, a Chicago billionaire donated $1.6 billion to a conservative political network in a single transaction — the largest political donation in American history. Voters had no legal right to know it happened. That's dark money, and it hit $1.9 billion in 2024.
5 min readIn 2024, six people each donated over $100 million to federal elections. Three hundred billionaires — 0.0087% of all donors — accounted for nearly 20% of all election spending. Your vote counted. Their vote counted $291 million times.
5 min readElon Musk spent $291 million on the 2024 election — more than any individual donor in American history. The money was legal, disclosed, and spent on one of the most direct experiments in political purchasing power the country has ever seen.
5 min read80% of Americans want Citizens United reversed — including 76% of Republicans. The DISCLOSE Act, which doesn't even overturn it but simply requires donors to identify themselves, cannot pass the Senate. Here's what's blocking reform and what would actually work.
6 min readThe fastest way to understand the system.

The definitive entry point. Oliver breaks down Citizens United, super PACs, and the coordination fiction in a way that makes you laugh and then feel sick. Required viewing.

Animated explainer on why your vote doesn't determine policy — and why that's not an accident. One of the most-shared videos on money in politics.

How $1.6 billion moves through a single anonymous transaction into the political system — legally, and invisibly. Covers the Barre Seid / Marble Freedom Trust transfer.
80%
of Americans oppose Citizens United — including 76% of Republicans and 81% of Independents. It is one of the few things the country broadly agrees on. The DISCLOSE Act — which would not overturn the ruling but simply require dark money donors to identify themselves — cannot pass the Senate. The people who would change the law are the same people who raised money under it.
The best external resources for understanding the full picture.
The documentary that started everything. Montana as ground zero for post-Citizens United dark money. Free on PBS.
50+ Senate floor speeches documenting the coordinated dark money campaign to reshape the Supreme Court.
Real-time data on every super PAC, every donor, every dollar in federal elections.
The most thorough plain-language explainer on the ruling and its consequences.